I thought that this was a very interesting topic. I was not very informed on this issues. Well to be honest I had no idea what it was anyways ha. I really like how the author Burnett used so many examples to prove his point. For example Burberry says "while state forests in Montana made $13.3 million, Montana's 10 national forests lost $42 million." That static hits you hard because it is hard to believe that our nation is losing money on there forest while state ones are gaining. This all seems so unethical. If this topic is on the same side for both political groups why do they not just come up with a compromise and make it so we do mpt lose that money. Everyone even has it wrong most talk about how logging is bad but it is not the true loser of money maybe we should look at the top ones and find awat to cut it and help with is problem. I also liked the formatting of his paper it was cert precise. He stated the issues with a lot of facts to back it up which makes this very credible. Then he goes on to what needs to be done. That shows how my paper should be formatted, and also that I need to have a lot of good accurate, non-argumentive facts. He solution is not only ethical, but practical. It also helps out a lot of people in the long run. I really enjoyed this passage, and it will really help me with the writing of my paper.
No comments:
Post a Comment